“Through him, She…”

I am finally reading the “Gospel of Ramakrishna” which I picked up over the summer. Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa was a Sanatana Dharmist in the truest sense I can think of. He tested every path for himself: From Daulism to Advaita, from Shaktism to Vaisnavism, to Sikhism, Buddhism and Jainism, to Islam and Christianity.Without delving into flat out pluralism or polytheism.

He found that all paths lead him back to Brahman. In worshiping God as Master (worshiping Rama through the eyes of faithful servant Hanuman), Father, Mother and Lover he found that all paths led back to the formless, attribute-less, undefinable Oneness, Brahman.

I recall that in my previous experience as a Christian I’d often hear folks say “Through Him, I” did this or that, meaning by the Grace of God, or in Jesus’ Name, they were able to do something. The account uses phrasing in relation to Ramakrishna’s samadhi with Maa Kali that caught my attention:

“Through him, She…”

In other words, through this frail quiet man then called Ghadadar, Maa Kali worked. Depending on the philosophy of those you associate with you will hear Hindus say we humans “do” nothing. And sometimes you will hear others say that God “does” nothing, that God is the Supremely Aloof Allness. Usually that refers to Brahman. But God, in this case Kali, is not Brahman, but an active (shakti) manifestation of That. It “does”. We do not. I guess that adds up for me. We act because we have to. It is a part of the dharma that makes the world go ’round, ya know? But we do not “do” or at least should not think of ourselves as “doing.”

Some people do not like the idea that we are “an instrument of God” but I view it as a helpful mindset to keep ego at bay. Other than that – and with all gender pronouns being understood as equal – both “Through Him, I…” and “Through him, She” suggest some individual divine favor. It’s a close race and between the two I can’t rightly say which suggests it more. If anything I can say that “Through him, She” is less dualist, but almost not even noticeably so. But their is definitely something refreshing about reading the phrasing with all of the Glory given over to Maa Kali.

Jai Maa!

This entry was posted in Abrahamic faiths, American Hindus, avatars, Avatars of Vishnu, bhakti, Bible, biography, book review, books, Brahman, Buddhism, Christ, Christianity, Comparitive Religion, consciousness, dharma, Dharma religions, Dharmic Faiths, Divine Mother, dualism, duality, Durga, Eastern Philosophy, ego, faith, God, guru, Hanuman, Hindu Sects, Hinduism, inner peace, inspiration, Islam, Jainism, Jesus, Kali, Krishna, Krishna Consciousness, Lord Hanuman, Lord Rama, myth, mythology, non-dualism, philosophy, pluralism, polytheism, Ramakrishna, religion, Sanatana Dharma, Self-Realization Fellowship, Shakti, Sikhism, spirituality, Vaishnavism, Vaisnavism, Vedanta, Vishnu, Vivekananda, yogis and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to “Through him, She…”

  1. Dhrishti says:

    I think it’s misleading when folks use the “Through Him, I…” option. Truly, I think there’s very little difference between that and the “Through him, She…” choice, but the first one (to me) indicates that the “instrument” is more aware than is usually the case. Like the flute being aware of Krishna’s breath moving through it and thereby permitting or enabling it to produce pleasing sound. That’s probably a pretty highly evolved flute, no? I’m going to generalize a bit, but in my experience it seems like the traditions that are most inclined toward option one are the least inclined to go within to experience that connected-ness.

    On the other hand, the second option (Through him, She…) doesn’t require that at all. In fact, it’s not even like “the other side of the coin,” it’s more like a totally different coin altogether and requires nothing more than an audience. In the first, the flute has to be consciously developed / evolved enough to be aware in a very first-hand manner of the breath flowing through it. But in the second, all that’s needed are listeners. A flute can make all kinds of sound, but if the listeners don’t experience “Him” through that sound, then it’s unlikely any listener is going to say, “through him, She…” – or in the case of Krishna, “through him, He…”

    For me, “through him, She…” is a greater thing because I can tell you all day long about my personal relationship with, say, Jesus, or I can tell you all day long about how I just KNOW the breath of Krishna flows through me, His flute – but if there’s no proof from where you are (the place of the listener) then it may well be just all in my head.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s